|
||||||||||||
|
|
Next
Previous
Contents
5. RAID setup
5.1 General setupThis is what you need for any of the RAID levels:
All of this is included as standard in most GNU/Linux distributions today. If your system has RAID support, you should have a file called
Create the partitions you want to include in your RAID set.
5.2 Downloading and installing the RAID toolsThe RAID tools are included in almost every major Linux distribution. IMPORTANT: If using Debian Woody (3.0) or later, you can install the package by running apt-get install raidtools2This raidtools2 is a modern version of the old raidtools
package, which doesn't support the persistent-superblock and parity-algorithm
settings.
5.3 Downloading and installing mdadmYou can download the most recent mdadm tarball at
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/mdadm/.
Issue a nice tar xvf ./mdadm-1.4.0.tgz cd mdadm-1.4.0.tgz make installIf using an RPM-based distribution, you can download and install the package file found at http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/mdadm/RPM. rpm -ihv mdadm-1.4.0-1.i386.rpmIf using Debian Woody (3.0) or later, you can install the package by running apt-get install mdadmGentoo has this package available in the portage tree. There you can run emerge mdadmOther distributions may also have this package available. Now, let's go mode-specific.
5.4 Linear modeOk, so you have two or more partitions which are not necessarily the same size (but of course can be), which you want to append to each other. Set up the
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level linear
nr-raid-disks 2
chunk-size 32
persistent-superblock 1
device /dev/sdb6
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdc5
raid-disk 1
Spare-disks are not supported here. If a disk dies, the array dies
with it. There's no information to put on a spare disk.
You're probably wondering why we specify a Ok, let's create the array. Run the command mkraid /dev/md0 This will initialize your array, write the persistent superblocks, and start the array. If you are using mdadm, a single command like mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=linear --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdb6 /dev/sdc5should create the array. The parameters talk for themselves. The output might look like this mdadm: chunk size defaults to 64K mdadm: array /dev/md0 started. Have a look in Now, you can create a filesystem, just like you would on any other
device, mount it, include it in your
5.5 RAID-0You have two or more devices, of approximately the same size, and you want to combine their storage capacity and also combine their performance by accessing them in parallel. Set up the
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 0
nr-raid-disks 2
persistent-superblock 1
chunk-size 4
device /dev/sdb6
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdc5
raid-disk 1
Like in Linear mode, spare disks are not supported here either. RAID-0
has no redundancy, so when a disk dies, the array goes with it.
Again, you just run mkraid /dev/md0to initialize the array. This should initialize the superblocks and start the raid device. Have a look in /proc/mdstat to see what's
going on. You should see that your device is now running.
/dev/md0 is now ready to be formatted, mounted, used and abused.
5.6 RAID-1You have two devices of approximately same size, and you want the two to be mirrors of each other. Eventually you have more devices, which you want to keep as stand-by spare-disks, that will automatically become a part of the mirror if one of the active devices break. Set up the
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 1
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks 0
persistent-superblock 1
device /dev/sdb6
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdc5
raid-disk 1
If you have spare disks, you can add them to the end of the device
specification like
device /dev/sdd5
spare-disk 0
Remember to set the nr-spare-disks entry correspondingly.
Ok, now we're all set to start initializing the RAID. The mirror must be constructed, eg. the contents (however unimportant now, since the device is still not formatted) of the two devices must be synchronized. Issue the mkraid /dev/md0command to begin the mirror initialization. Check out the Reconstruction is done using idle I/O bandwidth. So, your system should still be fairly responsive, although your disk LEDs should be glowing nicely. The reconstruction process is transparent, so you can actually use the device even though the mirror is currently under reconstruction. Try formatting the device, while the reconstruction is running. It will work. Also you can mount it and use it while reconstruction is running. Of Course, if the wrong disk breaks while the reconstruction is running, you're out of luck.
5.7 RAID-4Note! I haven't tested this setup myself. The setup below is my best guess, not something I have actually had up running. If you use RAID-4, please write to the author and share your experiences. You have three or more devices of roughly the same size, one device is significantly faster than the other devices, and you want to combine them all into one larger device, still maintaining some redundancy information. Eventually you have a number of devices you wish to use as spare-disks. Set up the
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 4
nr-raid-disks 4
nr-spare-disks 0
persistent-superblock 1
chunk-size 32
device /dev/sdb1
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdc1
raid-disk 1
device /dev/sdd1
raid-disk 2
device /dev/sde1
raid-disk 3
If we had any spare disks, they would be inserted in a similar way,
following the raid-disk specifications;
device /dev/sdf1
spare-disk 0
as usual.
Your array can be initialized with the mkraid /dev/md0command as usual. You should see the section on special options for mke2fs before formatting the device.
5.8 RAID-5You have three or more devices of roughly the same size, you want to combine them into a larger device, but still to maintain a degree of redundancy for data safety. Eventually you have a number of devices to use as spare-disks, that will not take part in the array before another device fails. If you use N devices where the smallest has size S, the size of the entire array will be (N-1)*S. This "missing" space is used for parity (redundancy) information. Thus, if any disk fails, all data stay intact. But if two disks fail, all data is lost. Set up the
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 5
nr-raid-disks 7
nr-spare-disks 0
persistent-superblock 1
parity-algorithm left-symmetric
chunk-size 32
device /dev/sda3
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdb1
raid-disk 1
device /dev/sdc1
raid-disk 2
device /dev/sdd1
raid-disk 3
device /dev/sde1
raid-disk 4
device /dev/sdf1
raid-disk 5
device /dev/sdg1
raid-disk 6
If we had any spare disks, they would be inserted in a similar way,
following the raid-disk specifications;
device /dev/sdh1
spare-disk 0
And so on.
A chunk size of 32 kB is a good default for many general purpose filesystems of this size. The array on which the above raidtab is used, is a 7 times 6 GB = 36 GB (remember the (n-1)*s = (7-1)*6 = 36) device. It holds an ext2 filesystem with a 4 kB block size. You could go higher with both array chunk-size and filesystem block-size if your filesystem is either much larger, or just holds very large files. Ok, enough talking. You set up the mkraid /dev/md0command, and see what happens. Hopefully your disks start working like mad, as they begin the reconstruction of your array. Have a look in /proc/mdstat to see what's going on.
If the device was successfully created, the reconstruction process has now begun. Your array is not consistent until this reconstruction phase has completed. However, the array is fully functional (except for the handling of device failures of course), and you can format it and use it even while it is reconstructing. See the section on special options for mke2fs before formatting the array. Ok, now when you have your RAID device running, you can always stop it or re-start it using the raidstop /dev/md0or raidstart /dev/md0commands. With mdadm you can stop the device using mdadm -S /dev/md0and re-start it with mdadm -R /dev/md0Instead of putting these into init-files and rebooting a zillion times to make that work, read on, and get autodetection running.
5.9 The Persistent SuperblockBack in "The Good Old Days" (TM), the raidtools would read your
Also, the old approach led to complications when mounting filesystems
on RAID devices. They could not be put in the The persistent superblocks solve these problems. When an array is
initialized with the You should however still maintain a consistent The persistent superblock is mandatory if you want auto-detection of your RAID devices upon system boot. This is described in the Autodetection section.
5.10 Chunk sizesThe chunk-size deserves an explanation. You can never write completely parallel to a set of disks. If you had two disks and wanted to write a byte, you would have to write four bits on each disk, actually, every second bit would go to disk 0 and the others to disk 1. Hardware just doesn't support that. Instead, we choose some chunk-size, which we define as the smallest "atomic" mass of data that can be written to the devices. A write of 16 kB with a chunk size of 4 kB, will cause the first and the third 4 kB chunks to be written to the first disk, and the second and fourth chunks to be written to the second disk, in the RAID-0 case with two disks. Thus, for large writes, you may see lower overhead by having fairly large chunks, whereas arrays that are primarily holding small files may benefit more from a smaller chunk size. Chunk sizes must be specified for all RAID levels, including linear mode. However, the chunk-size does not make any difference for linear mode. For optimal performance, you should experiment with the value, as well as with the block-size of the filesystem you put on the array. The argument to the chunk-size option in
RAID-0Data is written "almost" in parallel to the disks in the
array. Actually, If you specify a 4 kB chunk size, and write 16 kB to an array of three disks, the RAID system will write 4 kB to disks 0, 1 and 2, in parallel, then the remaining 4 kB to disk 0. A 32 kB chunk-size is a reasonable starting point for most arrays. But the optimal value depends very much on the number of drives involved, the content of the file system you put on it, and many other factors. Experiment with it, to get the best performance.
RAID-0 with ext2The following tip was contributed by michael@freenet-ag.de: There is more disk activity at the beginning of ext2fs block groups. On a single disk, that does not matter, but it can hurt RAID0, if all block groups happen to begin on the same disk. Example: With 4k stripe size and 4k block size, each block occupies one stripe. With two disks, the stripe-#disk-product is 2*4k=8k. The default block group size is 32768 blocks, so all block groups start on disk 0, which can easily become a hot spot, thus reducing overall performance. Unfortunately, the block group size can only be set in steps of 8 blocks (32k when using 4k blocks), so you can not avoid the problem by adjusting the block group size with the -g option of mkfs(8). If you add a disk, the stripe-#disk-product is 12, so the first block group starts on disk 0, the second block group starts on disk 2 and the third on disk 1. The load caused by disk activity at the block group beginnings spreads over all disks. In case you can not add a disk, try a stripe size of 32k. The stripe-#disk-product is 64k. Since you can change the block group size in steps of 8 blocks (32k), using a block group size of 32760 solves the problem. Additionally, the block group boundaries should fall on stripe boundaries. That is no problem in the examples above, but it could easily happen with larger stripe sizes.
RAID-1For writes, the chunk-size doesn't affect the array, since all data must be written to all disks no matter what. For reads however, the chunk-size specifies how much data to read serially from the participating disks. Since all active disks in the array contain the same information, the RAID layer has complete freedom in choosing from which disk information is read - this is used by the RAID code to improve average seek times by picking the disk best suited for any given read operation.
RAID-4When a write is done on a RAID-4 array, the parity information must be updated on the parity disk as well. The chunk-size affects read performance in the same way as in RAID-0, since reads from RAID-4 are done in the same way.
RAID-5On RAID-5, the chunk size has the same meaning for reads as for RAID-0. Writing on RAID-5 is a little more complicated: When a chunk is written on a RAID-5 array, the corresponding parity chunk must be updated as well. Updating a parity chunk requires either
A reasonable chunk-size for RAID-5 is 128 kB, but as always, you may want to experiment with this. Also see the section on special options for mke2fs. This affects RAID-5 performance.
5.11 Options for mke2fsThere is a special option available when formatting RAID-4 or -5
devices with mke2fs. The If the chunk-size is 32 kB, it means, that 32 kB of consecutive data will reside on one disk. If we want to build an ext2 filesystem with 4 kB block-size, we realize that there will be eight filesystem blocks in one array chunk. We can pass this information on the mke2fs utility, when creating the filesystem: mke2fs -b 4096 -R stride=8 /dev/md0 RAID-{4,5} performance is severely influenced by this option. I am unsure how the stride option will affect other RAID levels. If anyone has information on this, please send it in my direction. The ext2fs blocksize severely influences the performance of the filesystem. You should always use 4kB block size on any filesystem larger than a few hundred megabytes, unless you store a very large number of very small files on it.
Next Previous Contents | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||